Showing posts with label Reviews. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Reviews. Show all posts

Friday, November 13, 2009

Clarisonic Vs. Neutrogena Wave

After my post last night, I had a client contact me and ask me how the Clarisonic compares to the Neutrogena Wave.  I haven't personally tried the Wave, but I knew it was a similar concept.  I went to work today and had another person ask me the difference.  Being that there is such a big difference in the price points ($195 for the Clarisonic vs. $15 for the Neutrogena Wave), everyone wants the best bang for their buck, naturally.  I thought I'd research it and give some conclusive answers to all those inquiring minds!






On the Neutrogena website, it says that the Wave is a battery operated "vibrating cleanser" that is supposed to deep clean your skin.  It comes with "deep clean foaming pads", that you attach to the attachment head, run it under water, and then use it to cleanse your skin.  There are two speed settings, and it's water resistant.

That doesn't sound terrible, but let's break it down.  First off, battery operated compared to rechargable.  I don't know about you, but I HATE when something needs its batteries changed.  I don't even use batteries for anything anymore, so I don't ever have them laying around.  Add up the cost of batteries over time and that can get pricey, not to mention annoying.  The Clarisonic is rechargable, so all you have to do is set it on the cradle and it's always ready to go.

Next up is the issue of the deep clean foaming pads.  Personally, I'm NOT ok with the fact that I wouldn't be able to use my own cleanser.  I love my Epicuren, so that is a huge turn off about the Neutrogena to me.  It is a great way to get people to use their products, but the fact that you can't customize this product for your skin type isn't great. (And no, having an option between "Deep Clean Foaming Cleanser" or "Shine Free Blemish Free" pads doesn't consitute as being suitable for all skin types).  I read some reviews on the Wave, and there were a few consumers that said it made their skin "red and irritated". The Clarisonic has an option of three different brush heads for the face: Delicate, Sensitive, and Normal.  The Sensitive brush head is what comes standard when you order the unit, and that is what I use on the majority of my clients.  The Decliate brush head is for sensitive or rosacea skin types, and the Normal has a stiffer bristle, so although it says it can be used on combination/normal skin types, I still prefer the Sensitive brush head.  Still, it's nice to have options and to be able to customize the product to your needs!

The Neutrogena has two speed settings, and on their website it recommends the low speed for everyday use, and the higher speed for a deeper, weekly cleansing.  The Clarisonic model that I carry has four speed settings, which again, is more customizable.  The Clarisonic also has a timer on it.  You can set the timer many different ways.  The standard timer setting is for one minute - 20 seconds on the forehead, 20 for the nose/chin, and 10 for each cheek. I personally like having a timer, so I'm making sure I'm washing every area thoroughly, and the beeping noise makes it seem like a game!  As far as I know, the Wave does not have a timer.

I've also checked out some other websites that offer customer reviews, and it seems as though most people tried the Neutrogena Wave first, liked it, but were then blown away by the Clarisonic, to the point where it didn't compare.  The Wave just claims to deep clean, where as the Clarisonic has real life studies that offer proof to their results. It also seems as though the Neutrogena unit just vibrates, where as the Clarisonic uses a sonic frequency of more than 300 movements per second. The thing moves so fast it doesn't even look like it's moving if that makes sense (you have to see it to believe it).


So overall, yes, the Neutrogena is cheaper initially, but I would rather use something that will work with my skin type and actually gives substantial results.  In my opinion, you get what you pay for a lot of the time and this is another example of where the bigger inital investment pays off in the long run.


Monday, November 9, 2009

Cheap Alternative For a Makeup Primer

Don't worry, I'm not going to write about the wonders of chafing cream! I had gotten sucked in to youtube some random night awhile back, and I came across a makeup tutorial where this person said they used Monistat Chafing Powder Gel as a makeup primer.  They claimed it was as good as the Smashbox Photo Finish primer.  That's a lofty assertation, but I researched it further, and they indeed have very similar ingredients, for a fraction of the cost.  The Smashbox Photo finish runs for $36-42 for 1 oz., and the Monistat Chafing Gel runs for about $7 for 1.5 oz.  Photo Finish has been at the top of every magazine and every major beauty journal's list for the best foundation primer, for those not in the know.  A primer essentially preps your skin for foundation by filling in fine lines and wrinkles for a perfect look, and also providing staying power so your foundation lasts all day. 



I ordered mine on Amazon, where I got three tubes for about $20.  Three tubes will last me a long time, but it will be nice to know I won't run out of it in my makeup kit!  After trying it for myself, I have to say it is in fact an amazing product. It is super lightweight, silky feeling, and it just melts into your skin.  There's no scent to it, and it made my foundation go on so smoothly! And, the ultimate test: at the end of the day, my foundation was still in tact in my t-zone area. Love!  Whenever I hear that someone has taken a random product like this and put it on their face, I normally wonder what posessed them to do so (much like using Preparation H under your eyes), but I'm throwing reason out of the window on this one, because it is such an awesome substitute for a fraction of the cost.  Go get some!